Same hinged rod, but now the collision is elastic: the projectile bounces elastically off the end of the rod instead of embedding itself. Only one condition changes, and the whole balance changes with it.
- Angular momentum about the hinge is conserved (as in case 1, same reason: the hinge’s reaction has zero arm).
- Momentum is not conserved (as in case 1: there is the hinge’s impulsive reaction).
- Kinetic energy is conserved: the collision is elastic, .
Now there are two unknowns: (angular velocity of the rod) and (velocity of the projectile after the collision, with sign). So two equations are needed: conservation of and of .
Angular momentum equation (about the hinge):
with (only the rod: the projectile no longer embeds itself).
Kinetic energy equation:
Summary of case 2
Two unknowns (, ), two equations (, ): a quadratic system. It is solved like a generalised 1D elastic collision. As always in elastic collisions, the system has two solutions: the trivial one (no collision, , ) and the physical one.
Why there's no conservation of
Even in an elastic collision, if the rod is hinged the hinge exerts an impulsive constraint reaction that transmits an external impulse: total momentum is not conserved. You cannot write . This is the most treacherous mistake in this problem.
Collegamenti
Argomenti: Dinamica rotazionale Concetti: Conservazione del momento angolare · Urto elastico Competenze: Scelta del polo Oggetti: Asta
Esercizi collegati: Problema — La pattinatrice che si stringe · Esercizio svolto — proiettile contro asta incernierata · Problema — Perché il pattinatore ruota più veloce