We close with a surprise that links relativity to electromagnetism in an elegant and almost elementary way. A solenoid with NN turns and length \ell, carrying current ii, produces inside it a magnetic field

BB=μ0iN|\vec{B}|_B = \mu_0\,i\,\frac{N}{\ell}

measured in its own proper reference frame, SRB. Now consider an observer SRA who sees the solenoid moving with velocity vv along its own axis. By length contraction, in SRA the solenoid is shorter:

A=1v2/c2=γ\ell_A = \ell\,\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2} = \frac{\ell}{\gamma}

The crucial point is that the number of turns NN remains invariant: it is an objective count, because the atoms of the wire are the same in every reference frame and no turn can appear or disappear by changing observer. But if NN stays fixed while the length contracts by a factor γ\gamma, then in SRA the turn density N/AN/\ell_A is larger by that same factor. The field grows accordingly:

BA=μ0iNA=γBB\ev{|\vec{B}|_A = \mu_0\,i\,\frac{N}{\ell_A} = \gamma\cdot|\vec{B}|_B}

The magnetic field is therefore more intense precisely because the contracted turns have been packed closer together. This is a particularly clean way to show that E\vec{E} and B\vec{B} “mix” under Lorentz transformations: the very concept of a “pure magnetic field” is relative to the reference frame, and the same wire, viewed from a different SR, produces a different field. Einstein used exactly this kind of argument — geometric, never invoking tensor formalism — to convince himself that electromagnetism and relativity were inseparable, two faces of the same structure.

Topics: Relatività ristretta Concepts: Contrazione delle lunghezze Objects: Solenoide

Related exercises: Problema — Galleria a 0,8c · Problema — Contrazione di un’asta · Problema — Il fienile e il bastone