Before reinterpreting the photoelectric effect in terms of energy bands, it is useful to retrace the original experiment: discovered in 1887 by Heinrich Hertz, studied systematically by Philipp Lenard (Nobel 1905) and finally explained by Albert Einstein (1905, Nobel 1921 precisely for this explanation, not for relativity).

The apparatus

A vacuum tube contains two metal electrodes: a photosensitive plate (the cathode, typically sodium, potassium or zinc) and a collector (the anode). A transparent window allows the plate to be illuminated with monochromatic light of adjustable frequency ff and intensity II. A variable generator applies a voltage VV of arbitrary sign between cathode and anode: if V>0V>0 the electric field accelerates towards the collector the electrons emitted from the plate; if V<0V<0 (braking voltage) it repels them. An ammeter measures the current ii in the circuit.

Apparatus of the photoelectric effect. Light strikes the plate (cathode K); the electrons extracted cross the vacuum to reach the collector, generating a current measured by the ammeter. The variable voltage VV can accelerate or brake the photoelectrons.

Lenard’s observations (1902)

  1. For each metal there exists a threshold frequency f0f_0 below which no current is observed at all, however much the light intensity is increased.
  2. For f>f0f>f_0 the current appears instantaneously (in times <109<10^{-9} s), even at very weak intensities.
  3. Increasing the intensity II (at fixed ff) the current grows linearly, but the maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons does not change.
  4. Increasing the frequency ff (at fixed II) the maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons grows linearly with ff, regardless of II.
  5. The maximum kinetic energy is measured via the stopping voltage VsV_s, the minimum braking voltage that cancels the current: then Ecin,max=eVsE_\text{cin,max}=eV_s.

Why these are baffling for classical physics

In the classical view light is an electromagnetic wave, and its energy is proportional to the intensity II, not to the frequency. An intense wave should therefore always be able to extract electrons, provided one waits long enough for the electron oscillator to accumulate enough energy. Instead: a sharp threshold in frequency, no appreciable delay, kinetic energy independent of intensity. None of this fits the wave picture.

Einstein’s hypothesis (1905)

Light is made of quanta — photons — of energy E=hfE=h\,f. A photon that strikes an electron in the metal gives it all of its energy, or none at all: partial transfers do not exist. If the photon’s energy exceeds the extraction energy WW (the metal’s work function), the electron leaves with maximum kinetic energy:

Ecin,max=hfW\ev{E_\text{cin,max} = h\,f - W}

If instead hf<Whf<W, the electron stays trapped, and sending more photons at the same frequency is useless: each photon acts individually. Here is the explanation of the threshold:

f0=Whf_0 = \frac{W}{h}

Here is why the maximum kinetic energy does not depend on the intensity: II only determines the number of photons per second — that is, the current — not the energy of each one. And here is why there is no delay: the first photon with hf>Whf>W extracts an electron immediately.

Maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons as a function of frequency. The line has slope hh (Planck’s constant, the same for all metals) and intercept W-W on the vertical axis (dependent on the metal). Below f0f_0 there is no emission.

The line representing Ecin,max=hfWE_\text{cin,max}=hf-W thus has slope equal to Planck’s constant hh — the same for every metal! — and intercept W-W on the vertical axis, which instead depends on the metal. Measuring the stopping voltage as a function of frequency for different metals yields parallel lines: a very clean test of Einstein’s formula, carried out with great precision by Robert Millikan in 1916.

A concrete numerical case — the stopping voltage of sodium illuminated in the ultraviolet — is worked through in full among the exercises of this section.

Topics: Fisica quantistica Concepts: Effetto fotoelettrico · Fotone

Related exercises: Perché i raggi X non sono solo luce intensa · Ricavare h e W dal grafico fotoelettrico · Fotoelettroni dal sodio a 345 nm