Problem
Imagine a device that produces more work than the heat it absorbs from the hot source (). Which law of thermodynamics would it violate? And if instead exactly (with no heat rejected to the cold side), which law would it violate?
Solution
Definition. The efficiency is , with the work produced and the heat absorbed from the hot source.
Case . This would mean : the engine would produce more energy (as work) than it absorbs as heat. Over a cycle the internal energy returns to its initial value (), so the first law requires
Having would mean creating energy out of nothing: it violates the first law (conservation of energy). This is the classic perpetual motion machine of the first kind.
Case . Here and : all the absorbed heat becomes work, with nothing given up to the cold reservoir. Energy is conserved (the first law holds), but such a device — which draws heat from a single source and converts it entirely into work in a cyclic process — violates the second law in the Kelvin statement. This is the perpetual motion machine of the second kind.
Every real heat engine therefore has strictly, and is further bounded by the Carnot value .
Collegamenti
Argomenti: Macchine termiche Concetti: Rendimento · Primo principio della termodinamica · Secondo principio della termodinamica Competenze: Analisi di casi limite e fantafisica